Cases
PRECEDENT - ON POINT

Legal Precedent Search That Finds On-Point Cases and How Courts Ruled

Finding the case that is actually on point is the hard part. Cases does legal precedent search in plain English, surfaces the precedents that address your issue, and shows how courts ruled so you can see whether they help or hurt.

See pricing
Plain English Real, checkable citations
Try
ranked by relevance

How courts have ruled

Sample results, illustrative only. Informational research, not legal advice. Verify every citation.

In short

Legal precedent search is the task of finding earlier court decisions that address the issue in front of you and understanding how those courts ruled. Cases does this from a plain-English question: describe the issue and it returns the on-point precedents as headnote cards, each with a summary, the holding, and a real citation. Instead of building a boolean query and reading down a long result list, you see the cases that actually address your question first, with the holding on the card so you can tell quickly whether a case supports or cuts against your position. That turns a task that often takes hours into one that takes minutes for the finding part, while you keep full control of the reading and verifying part. Cases is informational research, not legal advice, so it shows you the citation and you confirm each case in the official reporter, and you determine whether a precedent is binding or persuasive for your jurisdiction before you rely on it.

§ CAPABILITY

What you get

Find precedent, built for attorneys, paralegals, and law students

On-point precedents first

Cases ranks results by how directly they address your question, so the cases most likely to be on point are at the top.

See how courts ruled

The holding on each card tells you what the court decided, so you can see at a glance whether a precedent helps or hurts.

Minutes, not hours

A plain-English question replaces a boolean query and a long result list, so the finding step is fast even when the issue is narrow.

You judge binding vs persuasive

Cases surfaces the precedents; you decide which are binding or persuasive for your jurisdiction. Informational research, not legal advice.

§ 4 STEPS

How it works

From a plain-English question to a cited case in four steps

01

Describe the issue

Ask in plain English for the legal point you are trying to find precedent on.

02

Get the on-point cases

Cases returns the precedents that address your issue, ranked by how on-point they are.

03

Read the holdings

Each card shows how the court ruled, so you see quickly which cases support your position.

04

Verify and place it

Confirm the citation in the official reporter and decide whether the precedent is binding or persuasive for you.

Find the right case in minutes

Ask your question in plain English and get on-point precedents with summaries, holdings, and citations you can check in the official reporter. Informational research, not legal advice.